<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 48. The Simplest Objections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/48-the-simplest-objections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/48-the-simplest-objections/</link>
	<description>Apologetics over lunch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin N.</title>
		<link>http://ccapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/48-the-simplest-objections/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccapologetics.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-89</guid>
		<description>The &quot;talking snake&quot; reference comes from Bill Maher and his new movie, Religulous, so this is something we will all likely hear more about as people see the movie.  I&#039;ve also I&#039;ve heard Bill mention that specific phrase on some of talk shows he has been on over the past few months as he has been promoting his movie.  I imagine a lot of skeptics like repeating such simple objectives and not taking the time to think that there may be more to it - thanks for your timely explanation that can be used to engage such people if they wish to discuss it more than simply repeating some smart sounding second hand objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;talking snake&#8221; reference comes from Bill Maher and his new movie, Religulous, so this is something we will all likely hear more about as people see the movie.  I&#8217;ve also I&#8217;ve heard Bill mention that specific phrase on some of talk shows he has been on over the past few months as he has been promoting his movie.  I imagine a lot of skeptics like repeating such simple objectives and not taking the time to think that there may be more to it &#8211; thanks for your timely explanation that can be used to engage such people if they wish to discuss it more than simply repeating some smart sounding second hand objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
